San Pan Frisco: Sandwich Pan.

Truth-Shock Podcast! Chatting about quantum computing scams, solar activity and the possible end of the world.

Live on X, Bitchute and Youtube, every Sunday around 6pm.

Truthspoon on X

Truthshock Podcast on Youtube

Truthspoon on Bitchute

John McAfee is not dead: he's just moved to another universe.

 Audio version of this article:

  

In quantum field theory, all possible trajectories of the single photon through the slits are objectively real, like Schrödinger’s cat, which is both alive and dead at the same time, until you open the box. There is however one main alternative theory to the Copenhagen interpretation and this is something people might have heard of because it has been quite publicized by some science fiction shows and TV science popularisers.

The many-worlds interpretation, posited by physicist and military scientist, Hugh Everett III, states that the wave function doesn’t actually collapse at all when a measurement of the position of the photon or other quantum object is made. Instead, what happens for instance when you open Schrödinger’s box, is that two realities are created, one where the cat is dead and one where it is alive. In that sense, the wave function is eternal and never truly collapses. Everett believed the whole universe was a single quantum wave which never collapses but just eternally branches out into ‘different worlds’. So for every photon or subatomic particle in the universe, there must be different universes where all the near infinite possibilities are expressed.[i] Believe it or not there are real scientists who believe this. For me, thinking like this is like following Ignacio de Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises, it’s a good way to induce auto-psychosis, or in other words, go insane.

Everett was scorned by fellow scientists at the time, but in recent times his theory has gained acceptance among people who really should know better. Everett believed in something called quantum immortality, which is a very strange kind of fabricated scientific thesis to allow him and indeed, everyone, to live forever. In his quantum immortality theory, he believed that because his many worlds theory of parallel universes, meant that things such as quantum particles were forever branching off to enter new universes, his consciousness too, would follow a path, eternally branching off into different universes, so as to always take the path that avoided death. So presumably he believed that on his deathbed, he would suddenly find himself in his own body, alive, but in a different universe, and this would presumably happen forever.

It does seem a particularly desperate way to gain the immortality of your soul, by inventing outlandish scientific and by definition, completely unprovable theories, when by definition, science prides itself on being provable.  There are easier ways to find out about life after death and they are simply by reading the words of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

It would make a pretty good science fiction story I guess, following someone through different near-death experiences, and finding himself reset at a different point, each time, and I wonder if it has been done yet. It would have a kind of Philip K Dick flavour perhaps, or it could be a scientist who somehow creates a device which allows him to escape death and live forever by switching between different universes. Everett would theorise about playing Russian roulette, and that if he shot himself his consciousness would then enter a different branch of the ‘many worlds’ and survive, presumably he believed he could eternally shoot himself in the head and his consciousness would always find itself in the winning branch with the gun still in his hand and holding a gun where the bullet is always in a different chamber. In fact, that iconic image of John McAfee holding a gun to his head, was part of an interview with Wired where he goes into his own theories about so called quantum suicide.

This is from a Sun article reporting on the Wired article, it’s clearly an example of second-hand news but I suppose it’s at least encouraging that the Sun is covering something like this which is somewhat outside their usual range of interests, not that I’ve really read a copy of the Sun since I used to deliver them on my paper round.

 “’Quantum suicide’ is a theoretical thought experiment which is based on the idea there are an infinite amount of parallel universes. The mind-bending theory goes that every decision creates a different universe, according to the basis of quantum mechanics. So the outlandish conceptual experiment claims if this is all true - you should be able to stand in front of loaded gun and survive. This is because your consciousness only continues in the parallel universe in which you survive - thus proving we have ‘quantum immortality’. Quantum suicide however is only an abstract thought experiment - and would not work in the real world - and it used mainly as a concept to help distinguish between different theories of quantum mechanics. McAfee however appears to have been intrigued by the idea. And the he even appeared to perform the thought experiment live for a journalist from WIRED[ii] in 2013.”[iii]

Beef Tree

Merry Christmas 1819 mad George the 3rd,

Jabbering nonsense for 58 hours

Thick foam gathering on his lips like eggnog

Then from the King a new noise was heard,

something like the whining and howling of a dog.

 

No your highness, that tree you are shaking hands with

is not the King of Prussia.

“No?” said the baffled king squinting, “Who is it then?”

 

The poetic steward started hinting, and said:

Your highness, put your hand down, let go of the tree,

For it is not a king, just a part of nature's beauty

But it was lost on the King, who greeted a rose bush instead.

 

And he spoke to his daughter, despite her being dead

And with paternal pride and joy at something wonderful,

He told her all about her own funeral.

 

He then buried a steak in the grounds of the castle,

An ingenious plan to feed the poor

Waiting for it to grow into a beef tree; 

He was surprised no one else had thought of it before.

It took the mind of a King to see things clearly.

 

 Andrew Carrington Hitchcock's website.

ACH (2114) Truthspoon – Shutter Island: Revelation Of The Method Of MK Ultra Trauma Based Mind Control

April 7, 2023 by achitchcock

In today’s show originally broadcast on April 7 2023, Andy is joined by Truthspoon, for a show entitled, “Shutter Island: Revelation Of The Method Of MK Ultra Trauma Based Mind Control.”

We discussed: how most people who have seen the film “Shutter Island” members of the public and critics alike, do not understand the film; the definition of psychological manipulation; the numerous MK Ultra projects of the 1950’s; the origins of Project Paperclip; gangstalking and workplace harassment; how people can be tricked into being hypnotised; the relationship between mind control and the practices of the ancient mystery schools; the mind control of the “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski; and many other topics.

 Click Here To Listen To The Show 

Click Here For Truthspoon’s Article “SHUTTER ISLAND! Revelation Of The Method Of MK Ultra Trauma Based Mind Control”

 

Link to show on Internet Archive.

Quantum Mechanics Primer

Audio version of this article:

   

Quantum Mechanics: The Mystery that Cannot Go Away.

The double-slit experiment, first performed in 1801 by Thomas Young is perhaps THE scientific experiment which represents the very beginning of the modern scientific era. It seeks to analyse the nature of light and discovers a new universe with new-rules but it was not until 100 years later that Max Planck coined the term ‘quanta’ as a way to describe a quantity or discrete unit of light from which we have the terminology of quantum physics. 

 The double-slit experiment is one of the simplest scientific experiments ever devised: it requires only two things: some light and an impermeable sheet with two slits in it. What the experiment lacks in complexity it has more than compensated for by the astonishing results which it has yielded. The double-slit experiment, is in itself, a 4-dimensional experiment, that is mutable and responsive to the observer. It is an experiment which exists and is repeatable and stable in the scientific sense, but infinitely changeable and although devised with a certain hypothesis and outcome in mind, which it delivered, can also give different and contrasting results, depending on how the experiment is performed.

 For instance, Thomas Young performed the experiment to analyse the nature of light which he suspected was a kind of wave. The supposed light ‘waves’ were duly produced by the ‘interference’ patterns produced when the light ‘waves’ went through the two slits, proving once and for all that light was indeed a ‘wave’ and everyone went away with happy faces. It was not until the invention of the cathode ray that single electrons could be fired through the double slits which would inexplicably lead to the same characteristic ‘wave’ diffraction patterns which Young had produced nearly a century before.

 

The dramatic conclusion reached was that a single particle somehow passes through both slits at once in order to create the wave interference pattern, or that light acts as both a wave and a particle at the same time, which appears to be an inherent contradiction. Furthermore, that if there were any attempt to measure or localise the light as it passed through the slits, then the ‘wave function’ collapsed and the pattern changed to show that only a single photon had passed through one of the slits and there was no wave diffraction pattern. 

The particularly peculiar thing about the double-slit experiment and the collapse of the wave function is that it is not the measuring or recording device itself which collapses the wave function but it seems to be consciousness itself which does this, and many elaborations on the double-slit experiment have been devised precisely to test this strange hypothesis which has so disturbed many renowned scientists.

For instance, if an interferometer is introduced into the experiment to pinpoint the position of the 4d photon, then the wave function collapses and we see a pattern which would indicate that the photon has passed as a particle through one of the two slits. However, if there was no 'access' to the information and the observer had no idea which slit the photon had passed through, then it would behave as a wave and the wave function would be maintained and it would create a wave diffraction pattern. So, if our minds can have an effect over one photon or electron then what more control can we have over the whole light-based reality?

Quantum physics puts the human mind at the centre of the phenomenon and, by implication the observer seems to play an active part in ordering reality itself. But back in 1801, before any of this was ever dreamed of, Thomas Young performed the experiment to analyse the nature of light which he suspected was a kind of wave, and he actually used sunlight.

Sunlight was sent through the metal sheet with two slits and an interference pattern was produced on the screen by the light ‘wave’ passing through the slits and creating the wave interference pattern. The interference pattern which is so central to quantum physics, is composed of alternating bright bands and dark bands, so light waves coming out of one slit, interacted with the light waves coming out of the other slit, and where the two waves met at peaks or troughs, they reinforced each other and created a bright band of light, while where a peak met a trough, the waves cancelled each other out and a dark band was produced on the screen. The bright and dark bands on the screen are a two-dimensional representation of the two wave fronts reinforcing (as in the bright areas) or cancelling each other out (as in the dark areas).

He proved to himself and science, that the light ‘waves’ went through the two slits, as waves, interfered with each other, so to speak, and then formed the interference pattern on the screen, proving once and for all that light was indeed a ‘wave’, at least so they thought. It was not until the invention of the cathode ray that subatomic, single free electrons could be fired through the double slits, although now, they can use attenuated or low power lasers to fire single photons.

Since electrons, as subatomic particles are also ‘quantum objects’ like photons, atoms and more recently, molecules up to a certain size. It might have been presumed that firing single ‘particles’ would create a different kind of pattern of light on the screen, perhaps one showing two bright bands, where the particles had passed through one slit or the other. However, instead, firing single electrons through the slits, incrementally created the same interference pattern as if light waves were passing through both slits simultaneously, and interacting with each other as before, the waves either reinforcing or cancelling each other out in order to create the interference pattern.  But how can it be that single quantum electrons, passing individually through one of the two slits can create an interference pattern as if they are interacting with each other and passing through both slits at once and interfering with each other as if they are part of some kind of unified whole?

 The dramatic conclusion of this experiment is that the quantum particle is both a wave and a particle at the same time. Speaking of the Double Slit experiment, our friend Richard Feynman said:

 “…this one experiment.. has been designed to contain all of the mystery of quantum mechanics, to put you up against the paradoxes and mysteries and peculiarities of nature one hundred per cent. Any other situation in quantum mechanics, it turns out, can always be explained by saying, 'You remember the case of the experiment with the two holes? It's the same thing'. I am going to tell you about the experiment with the two holes. I am baring nature in her most elegant and difficult form.”[i]

GIANTS

 

The etymology of the word Nephilim Swedenborg gives as relating to the Hebrew word Naphal: to fall, so it either means ‘fallen ones’ or ‘those who fall on others’.

According to Swedenborg, not all the Nephilim perished in the great flood and some went on to father what he describes as, “the seven profane tribes which are known as the Avim, the Anakim, the Horim, the Emim, the Zuzim, the Zamzummim, and the Rephaim.”

As for the presence of these tribes in the present day, I would say it is clear that they exist in some form and their descendants literally walk among us, but the last traces scholars have made of them are as follows:

Avim: David Rohl suggests Ahhotep II who drove the Greater Hyksos Caphtorim out of Egypt, was an important descendant of this earlier Palestinian group and became the inspiration behind the legend of Io.

Anak, the Anak were described as very tall and may be one of the origins of the Nephilim being described as ‘giants’. The word Anak is also the Hebrew word for giant. Robert Graves identifies the Anakim with Anax, the giant ruler of the Anactorians in Greek mythology. They inhabited the area later known as Edom and Moab.

Horim: later became a Bronze Age people known as the Hurrians who settled extensively throughout Iraq, Syria and Anatolia (modern day Turkey) the present-day people of Armenia are the only national remnant of this people and they are intermixed with the Uratians. The term ‘Horim’ means ‘free-people’.

Emim: Their name means ‘dreaded ones’ and the root is from the Hebrew word ‘Eyma’ which means ‘terror’. “The Emims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakim” (Deuteronomy 2:10).

Zazu: According to the Hebrew Bible, the Zuzim or Zuzites (meaning "restless" or "roaming") were a tribe who lived in Ham, a land east of the Jordan River between Bashan and Moab. The Zuzim were conquered by the Elamite King Chedorlaomer (Genesis 14:5). Many scholars identify the Zuzim with the Zamzummim, a tribe of the Rephaim living in the same region as the Zuzim and later occupied by the Ammonites. In Hebrew "Zuz" represents the root "z'z" which means, "to move" and is likely associated with the Ancient Egyptian "s's" meaning, "to move on foot" as in the "ssw" or Shasu. The Shasu and Zuzim may be one and the same if one considers their close proximity to the Horites "Kharu" and Hebrews "Habiru" as they are described in Egyptian lists.

Egyptologist and archaeologist, Donald B. Redford has argued that the earliest Israelites, semi-nomadic highlanders in central Palestine mentioned on the Merneptah Stele at the end of the 13th century BC with reference made to Yahweh as: “Yahu in the land of the Šosū-nomad” are to be identified as a Shasu enclave. Since later Biblical tradition portrays Yahweh "coming forth from Seʿir", the Shasu, originally from Moab and northern Edom/Seʿir, went on to form one major element in the amalgam that would constitute the "Israel" which later established the Kingdom of Israel.

Rephaim: Again, these were a taller than average sized people. They are considered the ‘residents of the underworld’ wandering earthbound spirits, in other world, these could be the beings largely identified as Gods, demons and Djins. The Phoenicians considered the Rephaim ‘the divine ones’ and it is possible that many of the Gods of the ancient world are derived from the activity of the Rephaim. The etymology of the term ‘Rephaim’ has never been satisfactorily deduced.

Og of Bashan was one of the Rephaim whom Moses slayed and his capital was called Ashtaroth, also known as Ashtartu, Ashtara and means "Astarte of the Horns”, Astarte being the name of a Canaanite Goddess. Ashtaroth is the name of a demon in Jewish demonology.